Creativity in Writing Essays

Creativity in Writing Essays Creativity in Writing Essay Creativity in Writing Essay Emotion, thought, creeping fluctuations of life, all painted on the canvas of timeless origin, from the medium of ink that mimics blood from the author’s veins, creating an infinitely unique statement in time. Creativity in writing is the analyzation of the dusty corners of the writer’s soul. Which you pour the contents of your mind onto the blank page, full of possibility, leaving yourself there forever. Creative writing is an abstract recreation of life by the perspective of a thinking mind. It is timeless, moldable, born from formless idea and bearer of unending complexity. In my experience of the art, I have enjoyed traveling the twisted caverns of my mind, and I have discovered realities which, I am in ultimate control over the nature of its existence. I use my pen as an instrument of transportation, a portal, sending me away from the stagnicity of simple reality. In writing, I found new sight in which, I see the abstract connective tissues if thought binding the strings of existence to a single source which, screams for interpretation. Though to define undisputedly, writing is the channeling of perception in printed form. Poetry, for example, is a method of writing that contains the purest images of thought, due to the unrestricted of form and format. In contract, Screenwriting possesses a greater amount of form and content is influenced by the attended audience. While Poetry and Screenwriting hug the extremes of creative writing, fiction and Creative Non- fiction maintains a balance between the abstract nature of creativity and formatting/content influence from prose and intended audiences. Each method demands a unique manner of expression from the author, but all derives from the perception of the writer. Throughout the course, I have learned greater amounts of information regarding the various complexities of the art than I originally anticipated. As a writer, one continuously evolves into better versions of himself, a slo

The Nature of Realism in the Film 'Psycho Movie Review

The Nature of Realism in the Film 'Psycho - Movie Review Example Yet, there aren't any shots in the film that can be convincingly categorized as one of horror. What is achieved ultimately is the unfolding of the emerging suspense through plots of actions pieced together in order to serve as background and also connect them to the central story. There is not even an iota of the ethereal to make the film look like it is made using standards other than what is common in daily life. Undoubtedly, Hitchcock has successfully utilized the rules of dramatics to keep the audience on the edge with well crafted sequences, actions and dialogues, and has taken the trouble to keep the hearts beating fast to match the film with the title. The film begins randomly with the scene of the city of Phoenix and settles down on a window with the Venetian blinds covering it. The scene within the window is that of Marion Crane and Sam Loomis engaged in love making. Marion goes on to hog the scene from then on for nearly half of the film's duration. The film begins with her affair with Sam Loomis. From here we are taken to her office. At the office, she faces Tom Cassidy, played by Frank Albertson, and his lecherous behavior. She chooses to steal the money he gives her in cash to buy a home for "his little girl." This event is actually the precursor to the entire film. Had she not secretly decided to steal the money, she would not have had any reason to leave Phoenix, Arizona. Had she not left Phoenix, the circumstances leading to the making of the film might not have happened. Life would have continued as a normal routine. But things happen. Marion steals the money and decides to run away with it without knowing exactly where. All she knows is that she is in possession of 40,000 and the future looked bright with the money in hand. Hitchcock has a way of blending small events to make scintillating feature films. The wrongness in Marion's action in stealing the money is rendered insignificant with the antagonizing behavior of Cassidy. On the contrary, we find ourselves feeling pleased with her action because it serves the man right anyway. There is nothing wrong in conning a lecher. So Marion runs away and Hitchcock gradually takes us to the scene where Marion sitting in her car comes face to face with her boss. He takes a good look at her but does not see through her intentions and she drives away. As she drives on, the day begins to end. It is getting dark and the audience sees headlights of the oncoming vehicles gliding over Marion's face. Sometimes the headlights flash behind her. She has left the city limits and is now driving in the open countryside. Nonetheless, the look of anxiety is playing on her face and she is tired. Finally she wants to sleep and her eyelids keep shutting

Principles of the Law of Negligence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Principles of the Law of Negligence - Essay Example The plaintiff argued that the defendant’s negligence (snail infested beer) caused her grievous emotional harm (shock) and extreme gastroenteritis. In her argument, she argued that the manufacturer was liable because he had manufactured beer that was meant for the consumption by the general public and which led to her illness. In fact, the bottle was labelled under his name, thus proving ownership of the beer and its contents. In addition, the beer was sealed before consumption meaning that the contents of the bottle (ginger beer and the snail) could be traced directly to Stevenson. Therefore, the defendant had a duty of care to Donoghue because she was directly harmed by his actions and the defendant should have had a check mechanism in place to ensure that the ginger beer was safe for public consumption. Since Stevenson failed to do this, he was liable for negligence. The plaintiff was unsuccessful in trial but her case was appealed in the House of Lords where it was ruled in her favor on grounds of the neighbor principle. In his judgement, Lord Atkins asserted that one should take reasonable care to ensure that one’s actions do not harm their neighbor.In short, one should not intentionally harm their neighbor in foresight, as they will be found to be negligent for any grievous harm inflicted on their neighbors due to their actions/ omissions. In this case, neighbors refer to people who are foreseeably affected in reasonable degree by a person’s omissions or actions.